Quote:
Originally posted by Aly-Python
As Sleazy has discussed with Joan a few times in the past, ASACP has had to be extremely careful in recent years with who it accepts money from. It is fundamentally crucial to the future effectiveness of the organization that it not compromise it's relationship with the FBI and other federal and international law enforcement agencies, in order to achieve it's primary objective of protecting children. This has been an exceptionally difficult task for the reasons that many of you have outlined in former posts. TGPs as a group have been asked to wait until ASACP has stronger monitoring processes in place due to the fact that many of them accept submissions from unknown sources. Other businesses, such as dating sites, are similarily complicated.
But it doesn't end there. It has been a major focus of the organization to resolve this issue, not only to be able to accept more donations, but more importantly to establish a means to track down CP sites and traffic sources.
ASACP is about to launch traffic monitoring technology that will make it possible to address these issues in a big way, and allow for the inclusion of sites like SleazyDream as a sponsor.
Sex.com has been extremely helpful in addressing and solving fundamental questions around 'better practices' of ASACP members and the monitoring and use of certain metatags, as well as addressing issues relating to the new technology.
I can't say that every sponsor or member of ASACP has no traffic from or links to CP content, but the organization itself will now be able to figure that out. This will allow ASACP to bring in more members and sponsors, and also allow those members and sponsors to know just how clean their traffic actually is and take appropriate action. This has the potential to build some major roadblocks in the movement of CP traffic.
No, JMan, ASACP is not some exclusive club based on who you know, it's an organization that has effectively put pedophiles behind bars, and protected the future of many children. And it has managed to do this by maintaining a positive relationship with the FBI during a time when 'Adult' is the last word they want to cooperate with.
Visit ASACP at Internext for more details on the technology if you'll be there.
Thanks.
|
I support what the asacp is trying to do and I believe in their cause whole heartly.
I HAVE tried to donate money to them in the past.
BUT, i was totally fine with that response till i found out that sex.com was a member. Thus my stance in this thread.
from what i can see, and correct me if I'm wrong, is that the asacp is concerned with the tgp marketplace in regards to the issue of 2257, which is understandable. But to turn around and fully accept and endorse a site like sex.com that cannot have 2257 on all it's advertising links is labeling 'TGP' as something bad. I can't see any difference in how my site deals with advertisers than how sex.com does? My advertisers are required to comply to my contract backed by financial contrubation which states they have to have 2257 and their submissions are all checked by human eye. I can't understand why the reasons given to me as to why I can't currently be a member shouldn't also apply to sex.com??????
it really LOOKS like a double standard from where I sit, and for an organizartion that's putting itself out there as representing the industry as a whole that just doesn't smell right.
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|