GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

XTC Max · 08-01-2004, 03:36 PM

The URL tracking language is way too vague in the revised regs. If it means I have to record that a certain set of pics is on 123.com then it's no problem. If it means I have to list http://www.123.com/images/1000234/001.jpg, http://www.123.com/images/1000234/002.jpg, etc, then it approaches impossible. Plus, consider the php based sites that are dynamically generated. This is another great example of the government trying to regulate an industry that isn't understood by any of the regulators.

I'm waiting to see what survives and makes it into the revised regs, but there is some potential for disaster there.

08-01-2004, 03:36 PM
XTC Max Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Midwestern US Posts: 54	The URL tracking language is way too vague in the revised regs. If it means I have to record that a certain set of pics is on 123.com then it's no problem. If it means I have to list http://www.123.com/images/1000234/001.jpg, http://www.123.com/images/1000234/002.jpg, etc, then it approaches impossible. Plus, consider the php based sites that are dynamically generated. This is another great example of the government trying to regulate an industry that isn't understood by any of the regulators. I'm waiting to see what survives and makes it into the revised regs, but there is some potential for disaster there. __________________ Lo, though I walk through the valley of the Shadow of Death, I shall fear no Evil...For I am the Shadow, and this is my valley...and who might YOU be?