Quote:
Originally posted by crockett
When you look at the implications at what is at stake, I can't blame them for not handing the info over until the law is in affect.
First off I believe this law violates the models right to privacy...
Why on earth would a content producer want to put himself at liability for giving out a models personal information with out written consent? They may have written consent to sell the pictures and videos but it if very unlikely, any have written consent to hand over the models personal info.
|
First he talking about current law not the proposed one.
Now onto what you said.
I have been to a few lawyers regarding these revisions. I am also located in California. As many will know California does have some of the strongest privacy and anti-stalking laws in the US, on top of the Federal privacy act.
1. If you model or put yourself out into public view for profit. You have less of a right to privacy. (take it as what it is)
2. In CA one can not share personal information with a 3rd party without written authorization. UNLESS you are doing so to comply with the law.
So in reality a provider in CA could share information. Be fully covered by the law and not need written consent to share the information. Not saying this is safe nor what we will do, but it is how it is.