|
We currently comply fully with the current law and are prepared to do what is necessary to comply with the upcoming revisions. Making available un-blacked out IDs is a simple step. The ramifications of this are much larger and I believe any jury would surely see the privacy issues involved and strike this down the first time it appears in court.
This is all webmasters need concern themselves with in regards to content providers. What's the big deal?
Next issue is URL tracking which needs to be more clearly defined because if it means the primary producer needs to keep track of every single url an image winds up on anywhere, then forget it... we're all going to jail. If it means only secondary producers are required to keep track of their own urls and where they place their content, then I think this is a fair and reasonable measure.
None of this will be known until the revision has been worked out and our comments taken into consideration (it's still possible to make your concerns known to the DOJ). When it is published we can all act accordingly.
At this point we can only expect and plan for the worse.
__________________
ICQ: 91139591
|