|
Content Providers and 2257
In the spirit of the 2257 discussions going on, I'd like to ask other content providers some things. These are honest questions and I'm not trying to crawl up anyones ass or anything. I've seen these issues pop up in other threads and I think they deserve a thread of their own.
To those advertising that their docs comply with the new regs: Do you include all the assumed names, aliases, maiden names and nicknames with the compliance info, as required by the new regs?
To all content providers: Are you willing and/or able (based on your local laws) to include this information?
To all content providers: Do you feel that a revised model release would be the best way to handle the issue of names and assumed names?
To all content providers: Will you still focus on serving the US market, or will you do as some have said they will and say "screw this, I can sell to the rest of the world."?
To all content providers: Will you be giving out IDs and Model Releases in the future?
To all content providers: Will you be removing the models contact information?
To all content providers: What will you be doing to fulfill the new 2257 law?
Not trying to piss anyone off or scare people, but I think it's important.
|