Quote:
Originally posted by eroswebmaster
It has only been discussed to death, in hearings on CSPAN, on the news..even in the O'Reilly Moore debate the other night....we all know except for your pathetic ass that we went into Iraq with "bad information." But we also all know except for your pathetic ass that it wasn't so much bad information as Bush looking for any and all excuses to go into Iraq.
|
Still, I'm waiting for proof here. You seem so enraged about this and yet no hard core evidence other than what you heard some Crossfire panelist say.. Talk about having the blinders on
This is a trick question, by the way. As I stated, if there WAS evidence, he would have been/in the process of being impeached. Since there is no evidence, lay off.
Since it was bad information, how come other countries came to the same conclusion BEFORE the war, and still stand by it today? Bush must have swayed them as well, no? France, Russia, Britain and US to this day still claim the same as Clinton's appointed George Tenet... "WMDs are a slam dunk."