07-26-2004, 09:55 PM
|
|
|
aspiring banker
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: toronto
Posts: 10,870
|
Quote:
Originally posted by detoxed
Are you SURE theres nothing illegal about it? I'm sure there is a law out there that can be used for this.
I'm sure the below has an equivalent not involving computers:
§3.01.2 Corrupting a Minor with the use of a Computer for Unlawful Sexual Purposes.
(A) Offense.? A person is guilty of corrupting a minor with the use of a computer or any other electronic device or system for sexually explicit conduct if the perpetrator was 18 years of age or older and that person:
(1)by any act using a computer or other electronic device or system, corrupted or sought to corrupt the morals of a child; or
(2)aided and abetted a perpetrator in corrupting the morals of a child.
(B) Any person who knowingly uses the computer or any other electronic device or system, to entice or encourage a minor to commit prostitution commits a summary offense.
(C) Any person who knowingly uses the computer or any other electronic device or system to encourage, advise, induce, persuade, coerce, order, command, cause, or assist a child to run away from home to engage in sexually explicit conduct commits a summary offense.
(D) Punishment.? Any person who violates this section commits a first degree felony.
(E) Presumptions.?In trials and hearing upon charges of violating the provisions of this section, the offender's knowledge of the child?s age and of the court?s orders and decrees concerning such minor shall be presumed in the absence of proof to the contrary. To overcome this presumption, the proof must establish the offender's ignorance of the minor's age, by a preponderance of the evidence presented.
(F) Defenses.?
(1) Mistake as to age.
(a) Whenever in this section the criminality of conduct depends upon the corruption of a minor whose actual age was under 18 years, it is not a defense that the defendant did not know the age of the minor, but did reasonably believe the child to be younger than 18 years of age.
(b) Whenever in this section the criminality of conduct depends upon the corruption of a minor whose actual age was 16 years of age or more but less than 18 years, it is a defense if the offender proves by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she reasonably believed the minor to be 18 years or older.
(2) It shall be no defense whether or not the jurisdiction of any juvenile court has attached or shall thereafter attach to such minor or whether or not such minor has been adjudicated a delinquent or shall thereafter be adjudicated a delinquent.
|
he used a phone to 'corrupt her morals'
so this whole thing you cut and pasted doesn't mean shit in this case |
|
|