|
I had read the proposed regulation, as you put it, prior to posting here.
Had I simply went out and read something, and came back to this thread, people would have said that I read the wrong regulation or the wrong source.
By getting AaronM to give me his source, I was insuring that when I read it, and gave him the information back to him, we were reading from the same regulation.
There seems to be some cross communication here.
Charly and I are right in that, according to the proposed amendments to the 2257 law, webmasters will be required to obtain and maintain 2257 documents from providers. We are discussing paragraph 75.2.b.
AaronM is right that paragraph 75.2.d says:
(d) For any record created or amended after [insert date 30 days
after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register], all such
records shall be organized alphabetically, or numerically where
appropriate, by the legal name of the performer
Some how, reading your responses, I was under the impression that you advocated that webmasters would not have to keep these records under paragraph 75.2.b.
I assume, based on your citation of the above paragraph, you were saying that it is not necessary to chase down 2257 documents today, because the requirement for webmasters to maintain those records will not take effect until 30 days after passage of the proposed amendments to the law.
I am sorry for calling you a Moron with a capital M... really.
|