Quote:
Originally posted by dready
It's possible this could be fought as an exceptional burden to small business
|
I believe this is the intent of the new regulations and a way to use 2257 to shutdown the "frontline of pornography" by being able to bust webmasters who display "objectionable" content in the name of saving children, to satisfy the religious right's agenda.
Political Action Committees and other lobby groups can lobby executive folks (like the president, Ash-o-hahahahaha, etc).. not just limited to Congress.
It will take the first prosecution to wake everyone up on this most serious issue. The first easy target will most likely be small time operators with no financial ability to defend themselves.
I seriously doubt that the ACLU or EFF will come in on this one.
Maybe FSC? IMPA? IFA?
SOL? LOL
You can ignore my 2257lookup servce if you want, but atleast get informed of the issues:
JD's 2257 Primer (attorney):
http://my.execpc.com/%7Exxxlaw/primer.html
JD's 2257 breakdown between current and proposed regulations:
http://my.execpc.com/~xxxlaw/2257Table.htm
My running FAQ on 2257 related issues:
http://www.2257lookup.com/2257ForWebmasters.html
-brandon