|
An interesting thought that was presented to me (paraphrasing the conversation):
If people are submitting their opinions to DOJ about what is wrong with the proposed regulations, and what could be done better, that the education process could help to define things more narrowly.
The new regs were supposed to remove the vagueness (ie. it now defines who is a secondary record keeper, whereas the current 2257 statue is vague), but then the new regs present some very vague new additions.
When the proposed regulations are amended to 2257 statue, then when it comes time for the first prosecution, the vagueness could go infavor of the defendant...
-brandon
|