07-15-2004, 10:52 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: near Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,850
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Elli
So, what are YOU going to do when the new 2257 regulation comes into effect?
For those of you who have not read the full statement, here is a brief summary:
You will be required to:
1) have each model's name, all aliases, maiden names, or other monikers on record
2) have US ISSUED picture ID (no illegal workers, please) for her/him (from a list of accepted ID)
3) have a picture with this info from the content shot
4) have a full list of the filenames of the photos or video shot of the model
5) have a full list of each and every location each filename was used, including specific URLs
This info must be CROSS INDEXED, which means the inspector must be able to search your database of records by any and all of the following:
- any of the model's names, real or assumed
- the filenames of her photos
- the title of the work the photos appear in
- the URLS the photos appear at
Every single work that you produce, be it website or book or video, must have in a font size comparable to the rest of the work, ON the MAIN PAGE, the location of the custodian of records (which must be your place of business anyway).
Who is exempt? Any sexual content produced before 1990 or any "SIMULATED sexual content". That's it.
So.. what's your plan, Stan?
http://www.avn.com/imagearchive/10/68/50/1068502257.pdf
|
The freaky thing about all of this is that it sounds like they'll be able to throw us in the pokey for years simply for overlooking one little filename -- doesn't matter if everybody on the site is legal, if your reams of PAPERWORK aren't cross-indexed then you've broken the law. Has nothing to do with protecting kids and everything to do with being able to burn us at the stake for nothing.
__________________
WebWhoreBucks: Girls, a guy and a tranny -- unique indie porn!
|
|
|