|
If it's truly all about children and marriage, then there should be a constitutional amendment to disallow "no-contest" divorces when children would be affected, right? That was one of sen. Clintons stands.
Also, arranged marriages have only about a 20 to 30% divorce rate. Compared to the 50 to 60% divorce rate of typical American marriages, arranged marriages are clearly better for children, right?
Bringing children and family into the debate was a tactic that didnt work. The No vote to not even debate the issue was a clear stand that we're not going to abuse the constitution for a political campaign. It had nothing to do with children or families.
__________________

You've read it, you can't unread it.
|