View Single Post
Old 07-15-2004, 08:14 AM  
Tom_PMs
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,049
If it's truly all about children and marriage, then there should be a constitutional amendment to disallow "no-contest" divorces when children would be affected, right? That was one of sen. Clintons stands.

Also, arranged marriages have only about a 20 to 30% divorce rate. Compared to the 50 to 60% divorce rate of typical American marriages, arranged marriages are clearly better for children, right?

Bringing children and family into the debate was a tactic that didnt work. The No vote to not even debate the issue was a clear stand that we're not going to abuse the constitution for a political campaign. It had nothing to do with children or families.
__________________

You've read it, you can't unread it.
Tom_PMs is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote