Quote:
Originally posted by FightThisPatent
A company would have to stop paying the agreement, which would be breach of contract, and then would get sued by acacia, then they could point to the defendants non-infringement verdict.
Means more legal bills to get out of something that might have seem a lower costly "business decision" then joining the defense group.
If someone is only paying $300/month to acacia, it might be cheaper to just keep paying them until 2011 when the patent expires than pay legal fees for breaching the contract.
Fight the End of the Mayan Calendar!
|
ahh that's only about 25-28k I guess for a major player that's nothing at all, just some chump change.. except maybe a bruse in the ole ego having to write out that $300 dollar check every month
