View Single Post
Old 07-13-2004, 09:13 AM  
James_Cash
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 28
I personally like this line:

In this case, the Court cannot define the term "identification encoding means" because there is no corresponding structure in the specification that is linked to the functions recited in the claims. If the Court adopts this finding as its final conclusion on this matter, this would render claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 of the '992 patent indefinite.





---------------------------

James

ICQ: 21267736
[email protected]
James_Cash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote