GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

[Labret] · 11-29-2001, 11:55 AM

Say you are working in sales of tangible products in the real world... televisions for example. And your employer agrees to pay you 50% on each sale. If that employer only paid you for a portion of those sales, it is pretty safe to assume that you have the makings of a nice lawsuit.

Why should this be any different when it comes to per click and per signups programs?

If XXX Pussy Cash (made that up) offers to pay me 50% on ALL signups, makes me sign their standard contract, and I can provide proof that XXX Pussy Cash do not end up paying me on ALL signups, I think I have the makings of a lawsuit.

Say I have proof, very good proof, that I am being shaved. Say I can round up several others in the same program that can also prove that they are being shaved. You think I should go for it? It would set an awesome precedent.

[This message has been edited by [Labret] (edited 11-29-2001).]

11-29-2001, 11:55 AM
[Labret] Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: Са́нкт-Петербу́рг Posts: 10,945	Shaving lawsuit Say you are working in sales of tangible products in the real world... televisions for example. And your employer agrees to pay you 50% on each sale. If that employer only paid you for a portion of those sales, it is pretty safe to assume that you have the makings of a nice lawsuit. Why should this be any different when it comes to per click and per signups programs? If XXX Pussy Cash (made that up) offers to pay me 50% on ALL signups, makes me sign their standard contract, and I can provide proof that XXX Pussy Cash do not end up paying me on ALL signups, I think I have the makings of a lawsuit. Say I have proof, very good proof, that I am being shaved. Say I can round up several others in the same program that can also prove that they are being shaved. You think I should go for it? It would set an awesome precedent. [This message has been edited by [Labret] (edited 11-29-2001).]