Quote:
Originally posted by boobmaster
Cutting spending would work just as well.
|
Yes!
Cutting spending would be one way to go, however Bush has decided to spend a shitload of money attacking Iraq.
Wouldn't that money be better spent hunting terrorists???
Which countries are going to be are next targets (under his iraq criteria)? We've got a lot of countries to invade in order to establish democracy and freedom and to prevent weapons of mass destruction from being developed in countries that we don't control.
So, Iraq is first and then what country is next??? Maybe Bush had some other agenda??? Why stop with iraq? That scumbag (Bush) deserves to have his nuts ripped off with pliers.
http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/wmd_state.htm
Even if we decided to spend this money in other ways (as opposed to attacking a sovereign country) we have many options:
http://costofwar.com/index-world-hunger.html
So, basically it should be clear to you that Bush isn't trying to "cut spending" in any way but he would like for the country to spend money it doesn't have in order to promote his agenda. I hope you can "cash in" like he will with his agenda because we will all be paying for this idiot for as far as we can see!