View Single Post
Old 07-02-2004, 05:17 PM  
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Those corrupt fucks, Scalia and Rehnquist claim that judges should strictly interpret the constitution - when it suits them.

The problem with what they say is that they don't follow their own advice when it comes to content they don't personally agree with. The First Amendment doesn't make an exception for material with nudity - it makes no exceptions for content.

Scalia and Rehnquist are activist judges, trying to enforce their personal morals on the American people instead of protecting the constitution.

At least Thomas, who is also a right winger, stood by the First Amendment in this case.
__________________
Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote