Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
The two most right wing religious judges, Scalia and Rehnquist, ruled against the porn industry, with one of them saying they first amendment doesn't portect porn.
Scalia's statement is inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution, but supports his strong religious beliefs.
John Kerry has repeatedly said that he strongly supports the separation between church and state.
Bush has repeatedly shown that he believes in trying to tear down the separation between church and state.
There is no defense of Bush on this issue.
The ACLU just saved your business. Read what Scalia said - he does not believe that you have any right to publish porn. None.
If you are a right wing pornographer, you should think very hard about the people you have been supporting. They want you in jail.
This is a direct quote from Scalia:
"Since this business could, consistent with the First Amendment, be banned entirely..."
|
There is no defense for any of them. It's inadequate to base on speculation that a democrat president will appoint a judge to oppose the law. That is no safe defense measure in my opinion.
Voting for Kerry isn't a realistic approach in aiding the porn industry at all.
How many times are they allowed to attempt to push this bill into law?
That is what I want to know.
That is what matters, because if they keep trying over and over again changing things here and there they will eventually get it.