View Single Post
Old 06-29-2004, 10:01 AM  
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally posted by DirkPitt
If you think about it, who wants kids surfing your sites anyway they don't have a credit card, they don't make you any money. So you can't just put a bunch of naked photos up on a site you have to censure them, put little stars or something over nipples and mid section. No more free pictures means more profits. It will also stir things up a little bit, nothing bad with a change in the business world. In the long run I think it might be better. Flame away you non-belivers and people that hate change.
This is not just about free porn pictures, it's about any material, including text, that would offend children - that includes mainstream magazines, health sites, news site, and just about any other site.

This is not about making more money, it's about free speech and the rights of people in a free society.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans have died all over the world to protect your freedom and you are more worried about making a few extra dollars. This issue if much bigger than just money.

Here is a quote from justice Scalia:

"Since this business could, consistent with the First Amendment, be banned entirely..."

Forget about the false idea of this helping you make more money and realize that they are talking about making the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution powerless to protect anyone who publishes material that offends children or Christians.
__________________
Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote