Quote:
Originally posted by LegendaryLars
I totally agree they will not use this filter..
They suck but that does not mean we should not use it.
And when the government is deciding who is next on the obscenity target they will pic the ones who have not done anything to reduce the risk to kids.
if your in front of a judge do you want to be able to say sir I have done all that is in my power to protect and shiled those who should not and do not want to see this stuff.
Or do ya wanna say sir I dont give a shit about anyone but making a buck..
And its not like this takes but 5 miniutes of your time and has no financial impact on you at all.
Why would anyone not label their sites once they know about it ?
I started this thread to educate people that this is available for free and its easy to implement !
I call on everyone who is always yammering about how they care and are in this for the long haul to implement this on their sites Do the right thing.
|
exactly correct.
i've used ICRA on all my sites for about 2 years now.
you do lose a small amount of traffic, and your total sales may suffer very slightly due to many corporate environments having filtering turned on by default so workers cannot surf smut while on the clock---but the savings in B/W from surfers who cannot buy your product anyway probably makes the loss a wash. (13 year old boys don't have credit cards, and they are unquestionably surfing porn sites)
as this poster suggests (correctly) it is the responsible thing to do, and because it's the RIGHT thing to do any argument against it is moot.
no one who uses IRCA can be accused of violating the "missleading domain law" and it does show a proactive approach to keeping minors off your sites.