|
"The coalition against Saddam has fallen apart or it's unraveling, let's put it that way. The sanctions are being violated. We don't know whether he's developing weapons of mass destruction. He'd better not be or there's going to be a consequence, should I be the president. "
Interesting read. Just snipped a bit for illustrative purposes only.
Illustrative of what? Of the argument that planning for invading Iraq has always been a priority for this administration. Even when "We don't know whether he's developing weapons of mass destruction."
It's old and out of date obviously, but they've often argued that there was no plans to invade Iraq before 9/11. I think they were clearly.
Anywho, I dont care for Bushs' debating ability or style. He tends to come off as arrogant and beyond questioning when I see him speak. Usually I see him speaking before a military audience though, and not in any real debates. I'm looking forward to the debates!
|