GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - SEO Experts, can I get your opinion on Google's reply on PR0 consumptionjunction.com?

http · 06-23-2004, 04:26 PM

Sue 1000 or so webmasters in 100 countries... ah ok

Your best bet is to encourage webmasters to join your program, achieve good positions for "consumption junction" and related terms and send that traffic YOUR way - where it belongs. This way you'll end up on top on all engines in the long term, and stay there even with changing search engine algorithms

The reason MANY SEO send their SE traffic to random, unrelated sites is they don't have the patience to target the audience of their doorways manually, or not the skills to do it automatically

I agree that sending "Consumption Junction" traffic to somewhere should not "be tops with you" but...

Right now you sound as if it'd make no difference to you whether the traffic in question is sent to YOU or someone else. Meaning that you just may sue someone who is sending CJ search engine queries to CJ.

I for one DO send SE traffic to sites (not yours) using i.e. the site names and have yet to get a single complaint from the program owners

The whole "it's my name/trademark so I must be #1 in google" approach just ain't fly with google. It is not going to happen. It may happen through the algorithm but not through "demanding" it. And you stand no chance in court against google in such a case - and very understandably so. From the point of view of a SE someone looking for "Microsoft something blabla" isn't necessarily looking for microsoft.com. And so on

I think recently there was a porn starlet on here complaining that someone "stole" or whatever "her" positions and her name in google. I am not sure whether the webmaster in question sent that traffic to a) a unrelated site or b) her "original" site or c) to a site featuring her - with legit content that she got paid for.

I don't see anything legally or morally wrong with sending "Pornstar Jamie Fuckme" search engine queries to the "original Jamie Fuckme site" or - if such site does a) not exist or b) has no affiliate program - to a general Porn Stars site that has content of Jamie Fuckme

I am fully aware that many think they can just sue away everyone in front of them in google and then magically end up on top.

I am just pointing out that this is not only wrong but also stupid on many levels.

Carry on...

06-23-2004, 04:26 PM
http Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 1,811	Sue 1000 or so webmasters in 100 countries... ah ok Your best bet is to encourage webmasters to join your program, achieve good positions for "consumption junction" and related terms and send that traffic YOUR way - where it belongs. This way you'll end up on top on all engines in the long term, and stay there even with changing search engine algorithms The reason MANY SEO send their SE traffic to random, unrelated sites is they don't have the patience to target the audience of their doorways manually, or not the skills to do it automatically I agree that sending "Consumption Junction" traffic to somewhere should not "be tops with you" but... Right now you sound as if it'd make no difference to you whether the traffic in question is sent to YOU or someone else. Meaning that you just may sue someone who is sending CJ search engine queries to CJ. I for one DO send SE traffic to sites (not yours) using i.e. the site names and have yet to get a single complaint from the program owners The whole "it's my name/trademark so I must be #1 in google" approach just ain't fly with google. It is not going to happen. It may happen through the algorithm but not through "demanding" it. And you stand no chance in court against google in such a case - and very understandably so. From the point of view of a SE someone looking for "Microsoft something blabla" isn't necessarily looking for microsoft.com. And so on I think recently there was a porn starlet on here complaining that someone "stole" or whatever "her" positions and her name in google. I am not sure whether the webmaster in question sent that traffic to a) a unrelated site or b) her "original" site or c) to a site featuring her - with legit content that she got paid for. I don't see anything legally or morally wrong with sending "Pornstar Jamie Fuckme" search engine queries to the "original Jamie Fuckme site" or - if such site does a) not exist or b) has no affiliate program - to a general Porn Stars site that has content of Jamie Fuckme I am fully aware that many think they can just sue away everyone in front of them in google and then magically end up on top. I am just pointing out that this is not only wrong but also stupid on many levels. Carry on...