Quote:
Originally posted by Gunni
Yeah, that is how I read it as well, and that's why he threw out their charge. They were obviously not concerned enough about their privacy to read the TOS, so they did not have a valid case to press charges against the company.
|
I don't think you get it....
The judge basically said.... since you did not read the agreement posted on the site, the agreement (in all it's benfits or burdens) does not apply to you.
You don't see how this decision effects a much broader scope of online agreements here?