|
I like comus, autogallery doesnt have nearly as many options. I don't know about the free version of comus but to buy it, its well worth the price.
I would have to say things I like over autogallery...
comus
Rotated thumbs every 10 mins to every day.
Ranking system as per clicked and they show you values of what is clicked and not.
update comus with 500 to 1000 galleries a week and never touch it again. depending on how many time you update a day.
comus webmaster submit page allows gallery submitters to make there own thumb with the script instead of photoshop and other programs. Got alot of complants about thumbs on other scripts not working with the rules of script. After switching to comus they where all happy and no emails about the script.
Easy sort feature to pull thumbs. Like you could have your own teen thumb galleries next spot submitted thumbs of amateurs next spot your galleries of a diffrent nich and so on. you can have your own galleries hidden so you can pull your own galleries in one spot lets say teens and then you can have in a diffrent spot submitted teens. Catagories are easy to change and add.
I dont know. I like comus for many reason. with auto gallery, its nice to start off with. and runs great. just not alot of features. Me personaly. I run autogallery on text tgps and comus on thumb tgps. I guess it's upto what your looking for in a script. Read what both have and see which one looks better or runs better.
|