Quote:
Originally posted by scoreman
To get an issue with standing before the high court he had to tailor his argument narrowly. The underlying issue is a family law child custody issue that is being driven by a constitutional issue. If the constitutional issue were decided in his favor the child custody law he was challenging would have been redirected back to the lower court on a reversal.
With all due respect, you are not seeing this issue for what it is.
|
this just isn't true. you're basically saying that he tricked his way infront of the supreme court. striking down "under god" from the pledge has NOTHING to do with child custody. Thinking it does just shows how misguided this clown is.