Quote:
Originally posted by Jimmie
I think BUSH has done a hell of a job, under the circumstances.
Had we not went to war, then he'd be dealing with EVERYONE bitching about not taking care of IRAQ. People fail to realize, IRAQ is known to harbor terrorists. Its also been widely known that they had or we working on WMD. When the first GULF war ended, IRAQ signed a treaty saying they had x amount of time to get rid of weapons & allow inspectors in. For over 12 years, they didnt follow those rules, the UN didnt have the balls to enforce the rules and Bush did what he felt was necessary to proctect the US.
|
but bush had some support for it and the 9/11 attacks had occured. clinton couldn't walk into iraq because he wouldn't have had any support globally or locally. the chance to do it was in the gulf war, but they left the twit there.
again we go back to bush sr.
Quote:
|
I suppose it's just coincidence that every single time they have been in power over the past 50-odd years, they done a better job of running the economy...
|
reagan did a great job other than the military spending which was prolly needed(might have saved future generations trillions). given the circumstances he did a very good job economy wise.