Quote:
Originally posted by jawanda
I agree in part, but the thing that you are not acknowledging is that 90% of our allies are whole-heartedly in support of the 'war on terror', but they want to see it done on an International level. Our decision to go into Iraq (basically) unilaterally was the real problem. If we had a president that was more active in working with other countries to fight terrorism (and actually listened to what they had to say) don't you think that the focus would be taken off of the US?
Also, I feel that the simple act of re-electing Bush will say to the world "The PEOPLE of the US agree with what Bush has done". Not a huge thing, but the opposite is also true. If we elect someone else, we will be saying "We don't agree with the way things have been done. We want to do it better."
IMO.
-p
|
I agree with a war on terror... but I am still not seeing where Iraq fits into this. AlQuada... Bin Ladden and all that should have been delt with.
