|
no offense but using the law as an excuse is just plain ignorant to stop gay marriages. i believe a short while ago it was illegal for women to read, slavery was lawful, african americans couldnt attend white schools, abortion rights, etc etc etc. hence we can have AMENDMENTS to change the laws that have previously been written. the supreme court does change the codes we live by so please dont mention marriage being unlawful because they have not anything so far to ban them and in the future they might even make it clear that it IS lawful for same sex marriages to occur.
and as for anyone making comments about the definition of marriage, you have got to be kidding on that one also. definitions of words evolve over time. gay once meant happy but now it also has another meaning. new words are also added to dictionaries so does that mean they shouldnt be allowed because they did not exist before? or should we allow them because they have been accepted as a new word into a laguage?
-myke
|