Alot of these folks are playing with fire US CP laws get quite vague, i.e.
Quote:
USC 2256:
(8) ''child pornography'' means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -
...
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
|
The way some of these folks advertise would seem to set them up for a fall. Frankly, that would be fine by me.