Thread: Legal question
View Single Post
Old 05-25-2004, 01:14 PM  
freeadultcontent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc"
Posts: 9,976
Tough call.

Although technically considered obscene by most. It has passed through at least 1 court ruling as not obscene.

Going over Cincinnati vs Mapplethorpe (90) in which Cincinnati lost the obscenity case on the photos. The photos in question did contain some pictures of gay fisting. In this case if any photos were found to be obscene then the whole exhibit was to be considered obscene.

Now draw your own conclusions, yet do keep in mind that Terry Cosgrove and Frank Prouty together kind of botched the trial.
freeadultcontent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote