chodadog

I'm so sick of seeing webmasters copping shit for having young looking girls on their websites. Some people would never stfu about Lightspeed "targetting pedos" and more recently, the appearnace of Little April and the text on her website from Triple X Cash.

It is totally normal for a guy to be attracted to girls around the age of 18. These girls *do* look about 18. But really, all that really matters is whether or not they are 18 years old. Case closed at that point, really.

But then people will say that even though the girls are 18, that they are targetting pedos. Some of you need to understand what attracts a paedophile. It's more than the appearance. It's the naive innocenece. It's the openness. It's the willingness to learn that a young child has and the ability of the paedophile to exploit it. As soon as you mention that a girl is 18 years old, then the appeal to a paedophile is lost because 18 year olds aren't malleable like a child.

"Hi, my name is April and i am 18 years old"

"I'm young, i'm LEGAL, i'm dirty"

Now, if the site made no mention of her age, then i'd say they appealing to paedophiles, perhaps unintentionally, but it's a non-issue because they do mention her age.

So it doesn't matter what you do. You could dress her up in a school girl's dress and surround her with teddy bears. Knowing she's 18 years old, paedophiles will not be interested.

The point is: Make it very clear that she's 18+ years old, and you're not doing a thing wrong.

__________________
26 + 6 = 1