GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Wtf? Nick Berg was an Al Qaeda operative?

Centurion · 05-13-2004, 07:15 PM

Don't know how many of you saw the CBS Evening news tonite (and it might have been on abc & nbc as well), but CBS did some STRONG hinting that Nick Berg was MORE than just an "innocent civilian" in Iraq.

First they brought out information that somehow the dude they captured in Minnesota known as the "20th hijacker" had access to some files/sites on the internet because he had Nick Berg's password!

And..what do you think the FBI was questioning him about when he was in custody in Iraq? Yep..that very fact!! The FBI supposedly said they let him go because it was JUST a coincidence about the password.

They hold him for 4 days or whatever it was and say it was no big deal then?

And while they didn't say it..there was a strong (or I was reading a lot into it) suggestion by CBS that POSSIBLY Berg was an Al Qaeda operative. And hmm..if he was, and they grabbed him because they were afraid he may have spilled some beans to the FBI about Al Qaeda? So then you off him on video and use him to "get back" at the abuse by Americans of Iraqi prisoners.

Kill two birds with one blade..literally?

Anyone else find this even faintly possible/resonable?

05-13-2004, 07:15 PM
Centurion Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: SeATtle Posts: 6,033	Wtf? Nick Berg was an Al Qaeda operative? Don't know how many of you saw the CBS Evening news tonite (and it might have been on abc & nbc as well), but CBS did some STRONG hinting that Nick Berg was MORE than just an "innocent civilian" in Iraq. First they brought out information that somehow the dude they captured in Minnesota known as the "20th hijacker" had access to some files/sites on the internet because he had Nick Berg's password! And..what do you think the FBI was questioning him about when he was in custody in Iraq? Yep..that very fact!! The FBI supposedly said they let him go because it was JUST a coincidence about the password. They hold him for 4 days or whatever it was and say it was no big deal then? And while they didn't say it..there was a strong (or I was reading a lot into it) suggestion by CBS that POSSIBLY Berg was an Al Qaeda operative. And hmm..if he was, and they grabbed him because they were afraid he may have spilled some beans to the FBI about Al Qaeda? So then you off him on video and use him to "get back" at the abuse by Americans of Iraqi prisoners. Kill two birds with one blade..literally? Anyone else find this even faintly possible/resonable?