View Single Post
Old 05-02-2004, 06:24 AM  
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally posted by quiet
my point was in the question. are soldiers personally responsible for there actions? for clarity, actions that they were directly ordered to undertake?

by 'convening powers that be', do you mean those that in essence, "win the war"? are you in fact saying that war crimes commited by those who win, are somewhat irrelevant?
In answer to the first question...yes...if those actions are deemed to be illegal...by whomever the convening power is. Whether it by by military court or as in the case of the aftermath of the 2nd World War...by tribunal.

In the case of the 2nd World War...if the Axis powers had won the war it would have been allies put on trial and the determiners of what was illegal would have been the Axis tribunal.

So...bottom line the relevancy or irrelvancy is determined by the convening power...be it by tribunal or by a military court.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

Last edited by theking; 05-02-2004 at 06:29 AM..
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote