Quote:
Originally posted by Corleone
k ... US generals confirmed it ( you belive them or? )
Tony Blair confirmed it too.
so you think this guy killed a family member of the soldier? he came over to britain and killed the soldiers kids .. thats sounds funny for me coz iraq never attacked the US or Britain.
they attack civilians and kids . k that might be true.. but the americans / british troops arent better.
they wanted to liberate them and bring them civilisation and democraty ( official. the real reason was oil btw)
but they act like drunken jerks
|
Oh God you're one of those people who think it was about oil? That explains a lot. Hmm? Where is all this oil? Oh wait maybe it was about WMD's? It had nothing to do with either. It had to do with UN Resolutions being ignored. WMD's were just a tool used to get the stupid and shallow on board. And oil? That's just an excuse liberals keep using because they have nothing else to go on.
And more allied troops every day trying not to cause harm to the civilians. Where as the savages they are defending themselves from hide behind them and kill them and kill them.
I will agree that the troops shouldn't be there. I will go as far as to say that they should have never gone over there. The Middle East is a waste of time and just filled with people who haven't been able to get along in over 2000 years. And for any leader to think that he can make a difference with these people is simply naive.
But they are they, and they doing the best job they can do against an enemy that is ruthless.