Quote:
Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday
Those motherfuckers are beyond wealthy and can afford their own security.. if they dont already have it..
|
Arguably, they probably are the ones paying for it since I would imagine they pay a good chunk of the taxes.
Either way, that is not something that should be put on public property. Hell, can a private security system even access a database with everyone's licence plates on demand?
Last I checked, Amendment 5 of the consitution goes as follows:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Obviously when this was written there were neither cars, licence plates, cameras, or much less cameras that could instantly conduct survelliance on the public.