Quote:
Originally posted by jact
Did you miss my comment about her being able to be 45 and it still being a grey area? I don't care her age, it's irrelevant really. They're creating the image that she's a young schoolgirl in pigtails, and it's that image that is going to be taken into consideration, not her drivers license. Regardless, people will keep cashing in on shit like this as long as there's cash to be made, so whatever. I wouldn't touch it personally but I know it'll get flocked all over by people who are into it.
|
I thought that law was overturned a while back?
I dont think that site is bad at all though. I guess the law can be interpreted in different ways, but the definition in Chapter 110 Section 2256 doesnt say anything about the way the legal models can dress or wear their hair. I think if the site claims they're underage, then it would be unacceptable... But if the law tells legal models what they can/can't wear, how to wear their hair, etc.. That's a huge problem.