Quote:
Originally posted by The Heron
I've read that stuff, you are somewhat correct I suppose that in some hick town in the midwest they might consider her site sexual explicit but she is over 18 and I doubt any rulings would stand. At any rate this thread was questioning how old the girl was and my reply was she is OVER 18. Not whether the uniform was questionable. Besides that fuck all you hypocritical morons that thing gangbang is more morally acceptable than non nude modeling.
What has been in the news recently? Yea, the gov going after EXTREME photographs, maybe you should be concerned about that too?
|
personally, i'm not worried about either.
my argument has nothing to do with morals. i'm simply pointing out lines in current law that could get people in trouble.
like i said, all it takes is one shit disturber. what happens when an affiliate of a site decides to mail out an ad for the site and a bedroom activist gets offended and hahahahahas a letter to their senator or whatever? it's a potential can of worms. at the very least, it's a pain in the ass.
it simply amazes me that people get into this business and invest hundreds if not thousands of dollars on hosting, design and content but don't bother to throw a few hundred dollars to a lawyer to make sure everything is legal.