notjoe

I Said this :

"By legal definition underaged preteen websites who display young children in skimpy clothes is not illegal...


You try to figure out how the law works when it comes to this shit and i'll sit back here and stick to my dictionary definitions and what my morals tell me is right and wrong"


And he responded with :

"whoa . . . I wasn't even going to read this thread, but am glad I did now.

Your morals tell you it is wrong what content does, yet you sell it?

How do you sleep at night? If I thought what I was doing was wrong, or that the people I was doing business with were doing something morally wrong I most certainly would not be in this line of work."

I guess he must think those sites are ok to have online and that it is ok to exploit kids as long as they're not getting fucked and they're not nude.

That is some sick shit.. i dont even need the law to tell me that those sites are wrong