Don?t forget the fictitious origin.
http://www.pathe-lolita.com/
Those that fantasise without a real desire to act out this fantasy are not paedophiles. Paedophiles require a little more than the staged act presented by sites like Club17 which by the way makes little reference to the word. And to the fool who says this site is illegal in his domain, I think not, maybe you should look beyond its fictitious story lines.
A recent and controversial TV programme shown on the UK Channel 4 summed up perfectly the kind of people that that run around wearing do good hats before first consulting the facts.
http://archive.nytimes.com/2001/08/0...pe/03LOND.html
All this energy wasted on easy insignificant targets when really it should be channelled into stopping the real child porn peddlers.