Quote:
Originally posted by NetRodent
Exactly. What's your point? Do you deny that the situation in pre-war Iraq contributed to the instablity of the Middle East?
You're not making any sense. Now you're saying everyone was talking about stablity? Earlier you were ranting about how everyone was duped into the war by Bush's claims weapons of mass destruction.
|
Wow. Wow.
Are you completely unable to pick up sarcasm? I was laying it on pretty god damn thick. Obviously "middle east stability" was not and is still not the way Bush and co sold the war to you OR to other nations. Are you just some kid who started paying attention to the world last week or something?
Quote:
Originally posted by NetRodent
While it is true that no wmd have been found, the perpetrator of the lie was Saddam, not Bush. Bush (and most of the rest of the world) fell for the lie. In a sense Saddam was brilliant, he could save some face and continue to maintain the illusion of a powerful Iraq simply by pretending that he might be hiding something. Unfortunately, he played the game little too well and waited too long to produce the evidence that he had dismantled his wmd programs.
|
What do you consider "most of the rest of the world"? If you think Australia, the UK, and Spain are "most of the rest of the world", well then, I don't even know what to say to that's so ridiculous. Not many nations fell for Bush's WMD lie, most had common sense and took a little more state in Hans Blitz that Colon Powell. Our 100 year old Prime Minster looked baby Bush in the eyes and told him to go fuck himself, and sent more troops to fight the real terrorists in Afghanistan.
You're so ass backwards I don't even know where to begin. Bush lied, you eat it up, and now you're saying is was Saddam and his administration on TV every day shouting about WMD? Shit maybe I should start watching Fox news, it sounds excellent.
Quote:
Originally posted by NetRodent
The US presence in Saudi Arabia was causing problems for the Saudi government. Since the US is on friendly terms with the Saudi government why would it not move its troops?
|
The question is, why is the US on friendly terms with the Saudi's? The Saudi royal family has been proven to fund terrorism, if you don't know that then it's time to turn off clear channel. Bush wants troops in every nation in the world besides the one that perpetrated 9/11, yeah that makes great sense. Also don't forget that we 've always been at war with Eastasia. Eurasia has always been our ally.
Quote:
Originally posted by NetRodent
Which camps? The ones in Afghanistan?
|
No, the ones in Saudi Arabia that are still educating children to hate America. Please, turn off the TV and pick up a book or magazine.
Quote:
Originally posted by NetRodent
I have also heard they left on 9/14 when the airports reopened.
|
Geez, I can't imagine where you heard that. Let me guess which one you're leaning towards believing... the one that contradicts the evidence but supports your party.
God dammit son, if you're going to do nothing but regurgitate CNN doublespeak, at least keep it to a minimum so I don't waste any more of my time explaining to you how you're a moron. At least 12dicks knows his place and doesn't try to actually say he's right about this. He just insults people to make himself feel like a big man, something the mustache doesn't cut it you know.
I know you're just going to go away, turn on the TV and think I'm wrong, maybe post something like "you are" or "you're talking about yourself" as you guys seem so fond of doing. Sad.