piker:
Quote:
Ok, I read all this and fail to see any evidence of the adminstration lying. I even see you speak of the economy which for all accounts is back on track and growing. We are still dealing with an overvalued dollar and therefore losing manufactoring jobs but thats dropping and the manufactoring jobs will be coming back.
You even claim the adminstration has caused deaths. I'd like to see some evidence or the thought process behind that view.
|
Oh hell.. I can't be bothered telling people what is even in the news media daily within the US and is being dicussed there and also globally. Where are you from?? :-) Mars?
On the economy.. yes, the stats show an improvement. That comes nowhere near "good", but is a start.
The overvalued dollar is ... probably right. The problem with that is it is likely to decline further and there are more "balancing" effects which are not good for the US. (Simple example - think gas.)
The main comment was that the current Admin have failed the US economy. Some aspects they have little control over - however by far, they have failed to implement *any* fiscal policy and it's only thank hell for the elected houses that they are questioning this now.
On deaths... that is one silly statement. What is on your TV set every day?? We are still waiting for "evidence" and "justification" for this war and what connection does it have to those who attacked the Twin Towers on 9/11?? Until *any* evidence appears, the world is aware this is an illegal war. You can bet if there was any evidence, the current Admin would the spreading the news in an effort to justify their actions.
Many more innocent people have been killed that ever were on 9/11. Many thousands more have been wounded and still thousands more will suffer severe mental and physical disabilities resulting from the effects of these "surgical strikes" and depleted uranium. This includes US solders who, it seems now, are suffering from the effects of depleted uranium from the Gulf War - the figures are bad news.
The decision to go to war was taken by a very inexperienced politican, backed by a group of advisors who would not be in any positions of power in any other western nation. I can't think of any "leader" in the western world who had this lack of experience when taking office.
Do you think that the current US Admin policy on the International Criminal Court was really "to protect US soldiers on a battefield"??? If so, gimme a break! :-) The International court judges have more sense than the Admin seem to suggest. It's more to do with "covering our own asses" again.