Quote:
Originally posted by piker
I will agree with you there, I am not a big fan of his mission from god stance. But if he is so be it as long as it doesnt cause problems. I don't think it is ok to have tyrannts but, on the same token it is not ok for us to invade whoever we think is a tyrant. Now if these tyrrants are significant threats to us like Saddam was then we need to do whatever we can rather if its diplomatic like in libya or force like in Iraq.
|
The guy is a religious fundamentalist, you obviously don't know enough about those crazy people. You shouldn't be supporting them.
What's your definition of a tyrant? Kim Jong Il is certainly a lot like Hitler and much worst than Saddam. Fact is, the US put itself in danger by invading a weak country like Iraq and experiencing all those problems.
Saddam was invaded and proved that he's no threat. The threats I see are Kim Jong Il, Islamic fundamentalists and Christian fundamentalists. But hey, let's see your excuse when Bush decides to invade another weak country. WMD's again? Actually if Saddam is a threat, then I don't know many countries who don't qualify as a threat.