Quote:
Originally posted by eroswebmaster
No I think you're missing the point...you know very well my stand on fantasy content...I've stated before that we as an industry should be able to get away with just about anything that is shown in a mainstream movie...however we are not afforded such liberties.
The rape fantasy etc is apples and oranges so I don't know why that was brought up....the drug fantasy is a bit more shaky only because we are asking people to do more than just act on film.
No one in their right mind would go back and say to Steven Spielberg that they want him to stop the production on his #1 box office hit because they were high at the time of filming...but someone who has issues may regret letting a group of guys gang bang them and then dump loads on their face and claim that they were in no way to consent to it.
I'm not questioning fantasy...what I am questioning is liabilty and legality in a civil case.
|
fair enough.
but stop using this set as leverage.
if a model was really under the influence, and was involved in being photod, fine, ill give that to you and would agree duress.
my only stance is using this set, since we all know it is professionaly done and is fantasy.
if you want to speak hypothetical , do so, but dont use this content as leverage ;)