Gemini wrote:
And you hit it right on the head tenletters! Why shouldn't a woman taking that 10" up the backside get pain premium wages! Not many can do that let alone WANT to do it.
My reply is:
Then the criterion should be penis size of the other actor, not his race. There are some giant white dicks around, after all.
You wrote:
TOO many photogs are paying garbage wages and making all the loot. Genre doesn't seem to matter. When I cammed, I Had photogs come out of the woodwork with BIG offers of 50-100 an hour (with a 2 hour max in most cases) to do shoots. Its like Yeah Right. I know first hand how much I made from tease shoots we did ourselves. The quality was as good as a so called photog and we made several hundred times the cash they offered in just a few months time.
My reply is:
I covered that pretty well elsewhere. Your experience aside (a) a lot of the girls are not entirely in it for the money; those who are will have to compete against that low-priced competition. Now, maybe you're arguing that someone should pay more than he/she has to for talent. I'm sure that idea would be good for a few yucks in an economics class. "Gee, I can get this girl for $50 an hour, but I think I'll pay her $250 anyway." Sorry, that's not the way the world works.
You wrote:
I don't think thats racism... I think it's trying to right the wrongful predudicial treatment content shooters are shoving down womens throats every day. Or should I say up there...-fill in the blank-
My reply is:
Look, no one is shoving any pay scale down anyone's throat or in any other orifice. If I go to Kinko's and they offer me $7.25 an hour, I don't have to take it. If I offer a girl $50 an hour, she can refuse it and walk over to Kinko's or try to find a producer who pays more.
I don't think any other system would actually work.
------------------
Producer of truly original teen/young woman-oriented adult content at
Wonders of the Unseen World