Quote:
|
if you don't know the game you can not judge
|
Well the game ain't that complex, it's someone signs up and someone pays.
Pretty much any monkey on the adult side can decipher the TOS at an
average sponsor. Many of these "complaints" (by webmasters) are
usually "I didn't get paid". There ain't a lot of rocket science involved here.
They cheated or they didn't. There is proof or there isn't.
Quote:
|
the comapnies he "investigates" are not obligated to talk to him
|
Agreed, yet he gets them to talk.
Quote:
|
he eliminates almost all chances for that webmaster of getting paid
|
Oh contraire my friend, if a webmaster submits to J.K. for assistance the
webmaster has usually exhausted all his/her resources hence they have
already concluded "I got stiffed". Any assistance from any outside parties
from there can/should be considered a helping hand at chasing lost funds.
They already didn't "get paid".
Quote:
|
That still doesn't obligate the sponsor to talk to him so he can't get the full story
|
Most "stories" are not that complicated...a webmaster didn't get a check
and all J.K. asks on behalf of the webmaster is "why?".
Quote:
|
please get your facts straight
|
Why should I start now?
All an agent has to provide is "I signed up". The onus of cheating proof lays
on the sponsor shoulders. IF the sponsor concludes they've been cheated
then they certainly would have proof. If they don't want to show that
proof then all they have to say is "It's company policy to keep all logs private
unless requested by a court of law, releasing any information pertaining to
how a webmaster cheated might only compromise our company and others
who provide a similar service". Let the webmaster file a writ.
When your talking smaller-than-my-lawyers-retainer-fee funds, then that's
where guys like J.K.Word fit in.