Ok, I'll deal with your points one at a time..... And pardon me if my comments get a bit heated, but when I feel strongly about something.....
You wrote:
Webmasters and Sponsors are in the business to make money.
Okay, you're going to start off by educating me about why we are in this business? Not a good start right there, but whatever....
If a webmaster is sending hits to a sponsor and they are converting at an acceptable level then why would the sponsor "can" this webmaster? Just because he is not following the rules? That doesn't make sense...
Excuse me, but then what the fuck are the rules FOR?? I follow them, and I make money. What's wrong with just following the rules and nevermind the cheating bullshit?
maybe that webmaster knows something the others don't... maybe the rules should be expanded to cover what that webmaster is doing.
That's what makes cheaters cheaters...they all think they know something that we don't. Maybe that webmaster should ASK the sponsor about their ideas FIRST instead of pissing a lot of people off. Do you even know what the hell I was referring to in my original post? I'm talking about the breaking of more than one of Len's rules in CRONIC proportions. Read what I wrote man, and quite making excuses for cheating idiots.
Now you may not like what some webmasters are doing when they submit to your TGP but that is business and you have to find a solution for that problem. But asking a Sponsor to "can" an affilate because you do not like what they are doing is not fair to the Sponsor because you are asking him to lose that business that particular webmaster is sending him just because you don't like what he is doing.
Okay, you're brain-dead-wrong, and here's why.... One) it is NOT my problem to find a solution, it is the webmaster's problem because he is now blacklisted and I'm on the watch for him. and I never let them fuck me for long, I always catch them. Always. What that means is that I have set out some rules for my TGP...one of which is that the submissions actually have thumbs linking to full-sized pictures, and I'm quite lenient about the size and amount of ads too. But my rules tend to coincide with those of the sponsors, in that pages can not have ONLY one blind sponsor link. This dufus was breaking more than one of Len's rules (no blind text links, no single link on page to AP with no other links), and he has been doing so on 50+ domains for months and months. I enforce my rules, why is it so wrong to let a sponsor know that his rules are also being broken???
Give your head a shake man, it sounds like you are saying "oh, it's okay to shoplift a few things in Walmart, because I spend $4000 bucks a week there, so why should Walmart have me arrested when they are making so much money from my business??" -- now THAT is what doesn't fucking make sense. You're aguments so far are....well, pretty much bull-kukka.
In closing maybe time would be better spent thinking of innovative ways to make sales instead of searching or "rulebreakers".
Okay, I'm going to clue you in here, in as simple and plain English as you can understand boyo... I'm not "
searching for rulebreakers", the rulebreakers come to me (and all other TGP owners, link site owners, sponsorship owners, paysite owners, and any-fucking-site owners for that matter) and when I catch them cheating me or someone I know, I blacklist their asses and I tell my friend about how he is being cheated. It's called good business, and you my friend really need to spend less time thinking up excuses for cheating assholes and start thinking of when you're going to come back here and show me that you've given your previous post some serious retooling.
Or, you can come back here and argue with me, definitely your choice. Hey, for all I know maybe you weren't thinking straight, and maybe, like me, you work very hard and were up very late and you let your clouded fuzzy addled head get the better of you.
In closing...I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now, but don't ever try to tell me how best to spend MY fucking time. Anyone that defends rulebreakers the way you just did has no business whatsoever dispensing such advice anyway.
My question stands.... is it common practise for these "productive cheaters" to be tolerated? I'm just asking. Does anyone have any intelligent comments about this? Lens? 12clicks?? Got a minute to shed some light, I know you are the "cheater-killer" of all time. Let's have your 2 cents worth bro.
<font face="Arial">
___________
CD
* <a href="http://www4.smutserver.com/babes/bgnetwork/submit.html" TARGET="_blank"><font color="#27FFFC">Babe Galleries Network</font></a> < -- submit galleries here
* <a href="http://www.oliver-klozov.com/cgi-bin/refer.cgi?ref=cdsmithok" TARGET="_blank"><font color="#CBE6FF">60% of all signups, 40% of all rebills</font></a> + High Quality free content, mthly cash bonuses
* <a href="http://members.home.net/cyberdogs/Anti-Censorship%20Site/" TARGET="_blank"><font color="#FFCCCC">
Sites Against Censorship</a>
<font color="#EDDDDD"> Support us, support your future</font></font>