Quote:
Originally posted by xmedia:
This guy is a "delete on site" at DMOZ. One of only a few people to ever achieve such distinction.
Because he sends a great deal of search engine traffic his signups tend to be pretty good. I doubt lensman would, or should, do anything to his account.
|
Wait a minute here....
In one breath you say this guy is pretty much the ultimate cheater ("delete on site"), and then you go on to say that Lens should let him slide? So...does this mean that as long as I send a lot of signups I can cheat? What kind of message is that kind of thinking sending out to webmasters?
I think Lens should just suck the guy's traffic and not pay him. Bottom line is, cheaters never win, or so I was told from the time of early childhood. If that statement is no longer true, then maybe I'm in the wrong business after all.
<font face="Arial">
___________
CD
* <a href="http://www4.smutserver.com/babes/bgnetwork/submit.html" TARGET="_blank"><font color="#27FFFC">Babe Galleries Network</font></a> < -- submit galleries here
* <a href="http://www.oliver-klozov.com/cgi-bin/refer.cgi?ref=cdsmithok" TARGET="_blank"><font color="#CBE6FF">60% of all signups, 40% of all rebills</font></a> + High Quality free content, mthly cash bonuses
* <a href="http://members.home.net/cyberdogs/Anti-Censorship%20Site/" TARGET="_blank"><font color="#FFCCCC">
Sites Against Censorship</a>
<font color="#EDDDDD"> Support us, support your future</font></font>