Quote:
Originally posted by Roger
I thought the US invaded to help the Iraqis. How is denying the Iraqis the products of other countries is supposed to help?
I see Bush screwing up everything the US have worked so hard to accomplish, that's what I see. Don't like the US justice system? Let's send them to Guantanamo Bay. Can't torture prisoners? Let's send them to our Syrian friends. Need proof before invading a country? Screw that. Need I go on?
Maybe you should read more about Rwanda. I'm currently reading Romeo Dallaire's book and he reveals interesting things about how super powers like France, the US and UK go about deciding wether they should send troops or not. They sent there own teams on the ground to investigate and you know what they report back? Something like: "Nothing of value here, only humans not much in the way of resources."
|
Who said anything about denying iraqis? I think the Iraqis should benefit from the products of their country.
You guys act as if this was all a republican conspiracy and none of this happened during the democratic presidency, many of the people who are serving in the judicial system, political office etc were also elected during the Clinton administration. The fact of the matter is that I dont think the republicans are "PERFECT" but I do think they have better beliefs than the democrats. The democrats are passive and care more about being someones friend instead of standing up for what is right. Many of the problems we face today as a country were set in place during a passive 8 years of the Clinton Admin.
Yes I will read more about Rwanda, as I stated I cannot speak on that subject as I know nothing about it personaly, but will make a point to research it myself and form my own opinion.
Good luck to you and have a good evening. Thanks for the intellectual discussion, maybe we can pick it up another time.