At the moment, I think this case revolves around making the providers of public terminals install filtering software to prevent the viewing of obscene materials by children.
What is good for us are the inherent flaws in filtering software. Because filters basically look for "inappropriate" words and block the user from accessing sites that contain these words, we are asking the court to define exactly which words in the language are actually obscene. Aside from a handful of curse words, I would hope that no one word could actually be proved indecent.
What is most unfair is that the "govt" wants to make the public providers pay to install software that is inadequate.
What they really should be doing is hiring adult webmasters to go plop their fannies in front of these (library, school ect.) terminals and block the real smut.
Funny thing is, aren't there supposed to be adults and teachers and librarians around these public terminals? Why the hell aren't they better skilled at looking in history and cookie folders?
------------------
tit,
Mowsebytes Porn Newsletter: Webmasters submit your sites
here.