|
I hate to be the cold dose of reality here , but here goes.
I dont see anything wrong with 99% of the domains he owns..
None of the domains imply or contain child porn in any way shape or form.
Because this is such a touchy subject i think i should go over them one by one.. ( the domains mentioned )
youngboysnude.com
gayyoungboys.com
Gay people refer to anyone under 25 as a young boy, so i cant see how this is implying cp, the domain contains no content to back up any supposed cp claims either.
littlenude.com
Absolutley nothing wrong with this domain at all, i like petite girls and so do lots of people, its a fetish.
teenylolita.com
this domain i would just toss right off the bat, too many questions. We all know the story behind lolita, and it's just a general good idea to turf this domain , it isn't worth the hassle.
With domains i really only have a few basic rules ( ethics )
NO IMPLYING CP i.e. underage-girls.com no no preteen-pics.com nono
NO TYPE INS DIRECTED AT MINORS i.e. dinsey.com etc etc
p.s. most sponsors use the same terms as mentioned in the domains above in text on pages you send traffic to.
|